Peter 123 wrote:Pansa wrote:
It makes no sense other than default, untrusted and untrusted to be scopes, and custom to be not.
But "Custom"
is a scope too. See e.g. the following sentences in blunelvita's guide:
blublevita wrote:
There are four scopes: Default, Trusted, Untrusted and Custom.
[...]
Only the Custom scope allows [...]
Sigh.
THen drop the effing word "scope", it's not in the interface to begin with.
default, trusted and untrusted are "groups" with members, and the rules apply to all members.
Custom is a setting that applies individually.
The first thing as you read the buttons should be to realise that there is a binary distinction. "custom" and "not custom". Because the word custom has MEANING.
Since you can customize the checkmarks in all 4, obviously that can't be what is custom about custom.
At which point you should already grasp that "default" makes no sense, if all things that are default (which means "not yet chosen to be something else") are different.
So if default makes no sense unless it applies to everything in it, and custom can't apply to the settings.....
The only logical conclusion is that changing the checkmarks on one line you set to custom should not apply to all the other customs (the lines being what makes it custom), and the default should apply to all of them. Because that is what default means if you obviously are allowed to change the checkmarks in it.
Which was awesome in 10.1.1, because right out of the gate clicking on a checkmark in custom switched that checkmark on in default.
Which was OBVIOUSLY a bug, because it made no sense in that system. Which you can only conclude because the system made sense to begin in the other aspects.
THe thing is when you just look at the information given, and take the words it gives you, there is really only one interpretation that works...
And what you propose is that instead of you looking at that, it should be the way you expect it without doing that.
>And if you read the comments here in this forum (or also outside from it) you will see that I am by far not the the only one who is confused by the new version. You should also think about why this happens.
Which is except for the people trying to help and trying to report bugs compromised of people having a problem. Which btw coincides with people who also frequently don't check whether a topic is already discussed 3 times on the first page..
And I don't know if you have, but I have read every single post made here since the release of 10.1.1 , and every change that was made to the behaviour off the addon between the version because "loads of people complained" spawned the direct opposite wave of people complaining about the inverse. Lots of people don't actually pay attention or don't look at things before they complain. That is what it is.
There just is a fundamental difference between something not being consistent in itself, and not what people are used to.
And things that are "not as they used to" will always spawn a lot of complaints, regardless whether they are actually internally consistent and concise in naming things.