by pirlouy » Sat Oct 16, 2010 6:10 pm
Hello,
ok, you'll accuse me of trolling, but Noscript has so much options than a lot of them are unknown for the majority of users (like me).
Why should we reenable
noscript.toStaticHTML and
noscript.surrogate.enabled later if Noscript works without them ?
Even after all these years, I still think there should be an extension for security, and an extension which blocks scripts, objects, frames.
Hello,
ok, you'll accuse me of trolling, but Noscript has so much options than a lot of them are unknown for the majority of users (like me).
Why should we reenable [b]noscript.toStaticHTML[/b] and [b]noscript.surrogate.enabled[/b] later if Noscript works without them ? :twisted:
Even after all these years, I still think there should be an extension for security, and an extension which blocks scripts, objects, frames. :twisted: