Giorgio,
What's the situation with NoScript for Chrome? Can I now look at Chrome with a serious eye!?!
Your plugin not being available for Chrome has been the sole reason I have remained faithful to Firefox.
Regards
Duke
Search found 13 matches
- Wed Aug 17, 2011 1:35 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: Noscript for Google Chrome?
- Replies: 154
- Views: 560449
- Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:48 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Stripping SSL and Sniffing HTTPS using SSLstrip
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2209
Stripping SSL and Sniffing HTTPS using SSLstrip
Just came across this video. Is NoScript able to counteract this?:
http://securitytube.net/Stripping-SSL-a ... video.aspx
http://securitytube.net/Stripping-SSL-a ... video.aspx
- Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:42 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: HTTPS -> Force the... issue with xmarks.com
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1708
Re: HTTPS -> Force the... issue with xmarks.com
Many thanks, Giorgio.
- Tue Jan 18, 2011 8:34 pm
- Forum: Security
- Topic: DNSSEC support query
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3911
Re: DNSSEC support query
Many thanks!!dhouwn wrote:Like https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo ... validator/?
- Mon Jan 17, 2011 6:58 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: HTTPS -> Force the... issue with xmarks.com
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1708
HTTPS -> Force the... issue with xmarks.com
OS: WinXP SP3 Browser: FireFox 3.6.13 Ok, this one has me totally stumped. If I enter *xmarks.com into https -> force, NoScript stops working. And by working I mean no instance of any https page can be logged into or functions properly. In fact I have to delete the line and restart firefox before th...
- Mon Jan 17, 2011 10:54 am
- Forum: Security
- Topic: DNSSEC support query
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3911
DNSSEC support query
Are there any plans to implement support for this functionality within NoScript or does it already do so?
Many thanks in advance.
Many thanks in advance.
- Sat Jan 15, 2011 4:54 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Regular expression issue
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1918
Re: Regular expression issue
Many thanks for the clarification. I have noticed that, in firefox error console, an [NoScript HTTPS] Forced URI https://[selection].com is not generated for any of 'or' selections, which is the case if I simply write *.google.com, for example. Is this an issue or normal behavior? Many thanks in adv...
- Sat Jan 15, 2011 11:06 am
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: Regular expression issue
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1918
Regular expression issue
Can anyone enlighten me as to why the following would not work in 'https -> force the following sites'?:
https://(?:encrypted|mail|docs)\.google\./(?:com|co\.uk)\b.*
or
(?:encrypted|mail|docs)\.google\./(?:com|co\.uk)\b.*
Many thanks in advance
https://(?:encrypted|mail|docs)\.google\./(?:com|co\.uk)\b.*
or
(?:encrypted|mail|docs)\.google\./(?:com|co\.uk)\b.*
Many thanks in advance
- Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:13 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: HowTo: Strict-Transport-Security query
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2558
Re: HowTo: Strict-Transport-Security query
Excellent!
So I can dispose of both HTTPS-Everywhere and Force-STS/STS UI (FireFox 4.0b8) by simply specifying domains in 'https-> force the following...'?
So I can dispose of both HTTPS-Everywhere and Force-STS/STS UI (FireFox 4.0b8) by simply specifying domains in 'https-> force the following...'?
- Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:28 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: HowTo: Strict-Transport-Security query
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2558
Re: HowTo: Strict-Transport-Security query
Just to be clear,
are you saying that:
1. NoScript automatically handles sites which support STS?
2. The code I exampled is redundant, or is there an instance where:
domain.com Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubdomains;
would be used?
are you saying that:
1. NoScript automatically handles sites which support STS?
2. The code I exampled is redundant, or is there an instance where:
domain.com Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubdomains;
would be used?
- Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:29 pm
- Forum: NoScript Support
- Topic: HowTo: Strict-Transport-Security query
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2558
HowTo: Strict-Transport-Security query
Am I correct in assuming that the following code can be written in 'https-> force the following...' secure.informaction.com Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubdomains; paypal.com Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubdomains to ensure STS for both specified sites?
- Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:13 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: HTTPS Mixed content
- Replies: 45
- Views: 24676
Re: HTTPS Mixed content
Many thanks for the heads-up, Giorgio.Giorgio Maone wrote:You should look into Tools|Error Console for messages starting with [NoScript ABE] which refer to GMail, in order to figure out an exception.Dukeswharf wrote:but am now experiencing problems with images not loading up in my gmail messages.
All works fine now.
- Mon Nov 08, 2010 5:37 pm
- Forum: NoScript Development
- Topic: HTTPS Mixed content
- Replies: 45
- Views: 24676
Re: HTTPS Mixed content
I have implemented the suggestions made earlier: Site .twimg.com Accept INC(IMAGE) from .twitter.com Site http: Deny INC from https: but am now experiencing problems with images not loading up in my gmail messages. How do I go about resolving this so that, as is the case with the above twitter line,...